For information about the Danvers family a visit to the web site of Gary Danvers and Jane Webster is a must.
Lots of pages packed with lots of information about this family. Follow these direct links:
www.reocities.com/garydanvers/Dauntsey.html
www.reocities.com/garydanvers/Gendex.html.
There is information contained in the Wiltshire Collections book about this family. You can see the entire
Dauntsey entry at Aubrey, but we have reproduced some bits for this family here.
John Jackson wrote in the 1860s:
-
-
given in the narrative of the Murder of Mr. Henry Long, in the Wilts. Archaeol. Mag. Vol. I.p.306. Of Lord Danby,
Aubrey says 'He was born at Dauntesey 28th day of June A.D.1573. He was of a magnificent and munificall spirit,
and made that noble Physic-Garden at Oxford and endowed it with I thinke £30 per annum. In the epistles of Degory
Wheare, History Professor of Oxford, in Latin, are severall addressed to his Lordship that doe recite his worth'.
(Prior has also some verses on the Earl's liberality to the Botanic Garden). 'He allowed £3000 a year for his
kitchen only. He bred up severall brave young gentlemen and preferred them; e.g., Colonel Legge and several others,
of which enquire further of my Lady Viscountess Purbeck. The estate of Henry Earle of Danby was above £11000 per
annum: near twelve.'
-
D. Lloyd says of him; 'He was called, by the Earl of Nottingham, at 25 years of age the best sea-captain in
England. Baron of Dauntesey at 30. His instalment as K.G. the greatest solemnity ever known in the memory of man.'
-
A fine full length portrait of the Earl of Danby by Vandyke, from Lord Orford's collection, now belongs to
W.H.H. Hartley Esq. of Lye Grove.
-
Lord Clarendon's account of the youngest of the three brothers, Sir John Danvers the Regicide, is not
prepossessing. Speaking of the King's trial he says 'The two men who were only known to the King before the
troubles were Sir Harry Mildmay, and Sir John Danvers, the younger brother and heir of the Earl of Danby. He was a
Gentleman of the privy chamber to the King, and being neglected by his brother (Lord Danby) and having, by a vain expense
in his way of living, contracted a vast debt, which he knew not how to pay, and being a proud, formal, weak man, between
being seduced and a seducer, became so far involved in their counsels, that he suffered himself to be applied to their
worst offices, taking it to be a high honour to sit upon the same bench with Cromwell, who employed and contemned him at
once: nor did that party of miscreants look upon any two men in the kingdom with that scorn and detestation, as
they did upon Danvers and Mildmay.' [Book xi. p.235, 8vo 1826.]"
John Aubrey, writing in the 1660s, had this to say:
-
-
family of the Stradlings: he (ie Sir Edward), and all his servants, except one plowboy who hid himself, were
murthered: by which meanes, this whole estate came to Anne his sister, and heire. She married after to Sir
John Danvers a handsome gentleman, who clapt up a match with her before she heard the newes, he, by good fortune lighting
upon the Messenger first. She lived at that time in Pater-Noster Rowe at London, and had but an ordinary portion.
This Robbery was donne on a Saturday night; the next day the Neighbours wondered none of the family came to Church;
they went to see what was the matter, and the Parson of the parish very gravely went along with them, who, by the boy
(i.e. the concealed plough-boy) was proved to be one of the company, and was, I think, hanged for his paines."
John Jackson researched Aubrey's notes, and (writing in the 1860s) adds:
-
-
written account whatsoever, nor in any of his researches relating to Wiltshire has he ever seen even the most remote
allusion to it. The tradition however still lives in the parish of Dauntesey; not only vivens, but
vivax: though probably now as unlike the original truth, as any tale could well be, that has been flitting
from village-mouth to mouth for nearly 400 years. The popular version at present seems to be that the Father had
gone to Parliament and had left his wife and son under the Parson's charge; that he and the Parish Clerk committed the
murder, as they thought, undetected, but the plough-boy, hidden in the oven, saw and told; that the Parson's name was
Cuthbert: and that he was starved to death in a cage on a gibbet in the field close by the Parsonage. As to
the Parish Clerk, (entitled of course, professionally, to a less exalted position,) him they bury alive, with his head
above ground. All this however presents nothing in aid of Aubrey's story. No such name as Cuthbert appears,
either in the list of Incumbents of Dauntesey, or in the general Register of the Clergy of Wilts about the period."
|